|
ИСТИНА |
Войти в систему Регистрация |
ИСТИНА ЦЭМИ РАН |
||
Horizons of Scientific Pluralism: Logics, Ontology, Mathematicsстатья
Информация о цитировании статьи получена из
Web of Science
Статья опубликована в журнале из списка Web of Science и/или Scopus
Дата последнего поиска статьи во внешних источниках: 26 июня 2019 г.
- Автор: Vasyukov V.L.
- Журнал: Journal of Applied Logics - IfCoLoG Journal of Logics and their Applications
- Том: 4
- Номер: 4
- Год издания: 2017
- Издательство: College Publications
- Местоположение издательства: United States
- Первая страница: 1477
- Последняя страница: 1494
- Аннотация: Discussions on the scientific pluralism typically involve the unity of science thesis, which has been first advanced by Neo-Positivists in the 1930-ies and later widely criticized in the late 1970-ies. In the present paper the problem of scientific pluralism is examined in the context of modern logic, where it became particularly pertinent after the emergence of non-Classical logics. Usual arguments in favor of a unique choice of “the” logical system are of an extralogical nature. The conception of Universal Logic as a theory of mutual translatability and combination of alternative logical systems allows for a more constructive approach to the issue. Logical pluralism gives rise not only to the ontological pluralism but also to non-Classical mathematics based on various non-Classical logics. Our analysis of ontological pluralism rises the following question: is our mathematics globally Classical and locally non-Classical (i.e. having non-Classical parts) or rather, the other way round, is globally non-Classical and only locally Classical? We conclude that in the context of post-non-Classical science the logical pluralism justifies one’s freedom to chose logical tools in conformity with one’s aims, norms and values.
- Добавил в систему: Петрухин Ярослав Игоревич