СУТЬ и ЕСТЬ

Автор: Циммерлинг А.В.
Сборник: Sub speciae aeternitatis. Cб. научных статей к 60-летию Вадима Борисовича Крысько / Отв.ред. И.М.Ладыженский, М.А.Пузина. М.: Азбуковник, 2021
Год издания: 2021
Место издания: Азбуковник Москва
Первая страница: 278
Последняя страница: 292
DOI: 10.31912/975-5-91172-215-9/278-29
Аннотация: This paper published in the Festschrift for professor Vadim Krysko discusses the evolution of two members of the present tense paradigm of the verb BE - historical 3SG ЕСТЬ and historical 3PL СУТЬ. In Old Russian, overt forms of the 3rd person of BE were primarily used as full verbs, while Middle Russian uses СУТЬ primarily as a copula. The spreading of the 3SG ЕСТЬ over the plural made the form СУТЬ redundant. I argue that non-bookish "wrong" uses of СУТЬ in other persons and numbers in Middle and Modern Russian can be explained as internal borrowings. The final section offers a new hypothesis on the origin of the set phrase "NE SUTJ VAZHNO". I argue that it has the structure NEG - AUX.PL - ADJ.SG.N with the bookish/Old Church Slavonic adjectival form of Pl.N - a which was incorrectly rendered with -o in vernacular Russian texts of the XIX century.
Добавил в систему: Циммерлинг Антон Владимирович

	ИСТИНА	Войти в систему Регистрация
	ИСТИНА ЦЭМИ РАН
	Главная Поиск Статистика О проекте Помощь

ИСТИНА