|
ИСТИНА |
Войти в систему Регистрация |
ИСТИНА ЦЭМИ РАН |
||
Reply to “Comment on ‘Anisotropic resonant scattering from uranium systems at the Uстатья
Информация о цитировании статьи получена из
Scopus
Статья опубликована в журнале из списка Web of Science и/или Scopus
Дата последнего поиска статьи во внешних источниках: 1 октября 2025 г.
- Авторы: Lawrence Bright E., Ovchinnikova E.N., Harding L.M., Porter D.G., Springell R., Dmitrienko V.E., Caciuffo R., Lander G.H.
- Журнал: Physical Review B
- Том: 111
- Номер: 3
- Год издания: 2025
- Издательство: American Physical Society
- Местоположение издательства: United States
- Номер статьи: 037102
- DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.111.037102
- Аннотация: In our paper [Phys. Rev. B 110, 125138 (2024)], we present the results of a series of anisotropic resonant x-ray scattering experiments conducted on epitaxial films of low-symmetry uranium compounds (U2N3 and U3O8).We observed a temperature-independent resonant signal at the uranium M4 absorption edge at weak and forbidden reflections. By utilizing the FDMNES code, we demonstrate that these results stem from the aspherical charge distributions of 5 f electrons around the uranium nucleus. For U2N3, where uranium atoms occupy two distinct sites of differing symmetry, labeled U1 and U2, we find that the contribution to resonant scattering from U1 is significantly smaller than that from U2, yet it is not negligible. In his Comment [Phys. Rev. B 111, 037101 (2025)], Lovesey argues that atoms located at the U1 site should contribute zero to the scattering due to symmetry constraints. Here, we clarify that this assertion is incorrect.
- Добавил в систему: Овчинникова Елена Николаевна