|
ИСТИНА |
Войти в систему Регистрация |
ИСТИНА ЦЭМИ РАН |
||
Coordination between posture and movement in a bimanual load-lifting task: is there a transfer?статья
Информация о цитировании статьи получена из
Scopus,
Web of Science
Статья опубликована в журнале из списка Web of Science и/или Scopus
Дата последнего поиска статьи во внешних источниках: 27 мая 2020 г.
- Авторы: Ioffe M., Massion J., Gantchev N., Dufosse M., Kulikov M.A.
- Журнал: Experimental Brain Research
- Том: 109
- Номер: 3
- Год издания: 1996
- Издательство: Springer Verlag
- Местоположение издательства: Germany
- Первая страница: 450
- Последняя страница: 456
- DOI: 10.1007/bf00229629
- Аннотация: The present experimental series was designed to test the possibility that an anticipatory postural adjustment learned during the performance of a bimanual load lifting task may be transferred between the upper extremities. Eight seated subjects were asked to maintain horizontally one forearm (postural arm) loaded with a 1kg load, which was fixed to the arm by means of an electromagnet. The unloading was triggered either by the experimenter pressing a switch (control) or by the subjects making a voluntary movement with their other arm (moving arm). In the latter case, the subject lifted a 1-kg load resting on a force platform with the moving hand, and the switching off was triggered when the force level reached a threshold of 0.5 kg. The maximum amplitude (MA) and the maximum velocity (MV) of the postural forearm elbow joint rotation occuring after the unloading were measured at each trial. The learning process was estimated by performing a regression analysis on each series of trials, using an exponential model, and from the intercept of the regression curve with the ordinate. 1. During the original learning session (three series of 20 trials), a decrease in MA and MV was found to occur both within the series and between the series during a session. 2. After the initial learning session, the sides of the postural and moving arm were interchanged to test whether any transfer had occurred. The first series of trials in the second session (transfer) and the last series of trials in the original learning session were compared and found to be significantly different in terms of the intercept (seven subjects in the case of MA, five subjects in the case of MV) and the slope (five subjects), indicating a lack of transfer. 3. The data recorded during the second transfer learning session indicated that learning occurred in all eight subjects in the case of MA and in six subjects in the case of MV. It was observed that the original learning session did not facilitate the second one. 4. The lack of transfer of the anticipatory postural adjustment observed in this task is discussed with reference to the data in the literature.
- Добавил в систему: Устинова Ксения Ивановна